| If you want to read through the past topics: Dating Interpretation Sin "Gay" Single Noah 2005 Trust/Promises Jesse - Round 1 Jesse - Round 2 Humanitarian Limits Poor Television Programming Eternal Salvation The Catholic Religion |
| Let's begin with the nimrod up in CU, Boulder, Colorado. There is this professor who is tenured, meaning he has job security. After 9/11, he wrote a paper in which he expressed his opinion that the victims deserved what they got because of the fact that they were Americans. Now that his paper has come to general public knowledge, even the Govenor of the State is calling for his termination. This "professor" is claiming that he is protected under the US Constitution's "Freedom of Speech" Ammendment. He even has more than one hundred of the other teachers and faculty supporting his freedom. Even I support his freedom of speech. What everybody seems to be overlooking here is that he works for an employer and writes these opinions as an employee. His actions are representative of that employer. Most every employer I've had has had a clause in my employment stating that any adverse actions I take in public or private can affect my employment if it negatively impacts the company. As a U.S. Citizen, this guy has the freedom of speech, but as an employee, his freedoms are at the fiat of his employer. His employer wants him out, which does not violate the Constitution or any of it's amendments. Buhbye, Idiot! |
| Ok, a couple of topics combined here! First, let's talk about a nimrod out at the University of Colorado, Boulder, who believes that he can write papers stating that the victims of the 9/11 homicides, deserved to be murdered. Second, while we're talking about constitutional protections, does that same Constitution actually state that there should be a seperation of the Church and State? |
| So, what do you think? Tell me about it... |
| While we're talking about the freedom of speech and the Constitution of the United States, let's look at that same Amendment that the nutty professor was using: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." |
That's our first Amendment. Do you see anything in there stating that we are supposed to seperate the Church and State? It clearly states that Congress shall make no laws prohibiting the free excercise of religion. But where does anybody see the seperation of the Church and State? Ok, it reads that the State shall not make any laws respectiong the establishment of a religion. So the Government cannot go out and make up a State religion...... Wait a second, they've done that! I've been to public school, they teach homosexuality and evolution. They have established their own religion and are teaching it in public schools! All that aside (a whole other conversation) there is nothing in that Amendment stating that we cannot place monuments or statues, the Ten Commandments or the Bible or any other expression of our Faith, in public places. It does not read that the Government cannot practice it's Faith during session or at any time while on the public dime. In fact, it plainly reads that there can be no laws created that prohibit the free expression of our Faith, including our public officials. If anything, the precedent of the liberals having established their anti-Christian religion in the public school systems should be enough to thwart any bleeding heart attacks on the Christian Faith (or any of the world's religions) and any expression thereof. |