If you want to read through the past topics:
Dating
Interpretation
Sin
"Gay"
Single
Trust/Promises
Jesse - Round 1
Jesse - Round 2
Quote from "Jesse":
"...Paul said tha a little bit of leven causes the congregation to perish because to serve God with faith mixed with works cannot b so according to scriptures..."
Jesse, I don't care too much for whatever language your Bible is in, or it's interpretations.
It is contradictory.
The Word of God is Pure, Absolute and does not contradict itself.
The Bible reads that while we are not saved by our works, lest any man should boast (Ephesians 2:8), that Faith without works is dead (James 2:28).
This means that you'll see the fruits of my Faith, in my good works, not in my sin, like bars, drugs, sex and whatever you insist can be done in Faith.
I'm afraid that you continue to seperate yourself from "us" the Body of Christ, the Church.
You're proud of that fact, that you don't worship the same Jesus who we do, whom we preach, the Jesus of the Bible, the Word of God, the Creator, of John 1:1.
The emails I've been getting are no longer supportive and are now condemning you.
I'm afraid, like your radio show, you are being cancelled.
James 2:28 " But someone will say, "You have faith; I have deeds."
    Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by what I do. You believe that there is one God. Good! Even the demons believe that--and shudder.

    You foolish man, do you want evidence that faith without deeds is useless? Was not our ancestor Abraham considered righteous for what he did when he offered his son Isaac on the altar? You see that his faith and his actions were working together, and his faith was made complete by what he did. And the scripture was fulfilled that says, "Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness," and he was called God's friend. You see that a person is justified by what he does and not by faith alone.

    In the same way, was not even Rahab the prostitute considered righteous for what she did when she gave lodging to the spies and sent them off in a different direction? As the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without deeds is dead."
The United States is one of the more powerful and one of the richest nations in the world.
With our Christian Faith and the Blessings that God has placed upon us, comes the responsibility to provide aid to our brothers in need across the globe.

Less than 42% of the monies given to the U.N. actually reach those in need.
The rest goes into the pockets of those who are oppressing the ones to whom we are trying to send the aid in the first place.

Let's see how this works:
The muslims suppress and oppress their people.
They kill everybody who oppose them.
While this genocide is going on, they insist we not get involved and stay out of their civil affairs.
As soon as the events get out of hand and the world gets wind, the U.N. starts backpedaling and claiming that the actions being taken by these leaders is atrocious.
Or a natural disaster occurs and the leaders don't want to spend the monies with which they've fattened their own bank accounts so the U.N. starts calling for the Westerners to send aid.
They limit access to private groups, evangelical groups and other groups that are not financially responsible to them and instead insist that we give money to them, to distribute as they see fit.

Less than 42% of that money actually reaches the folks in need.
The rest goes into the pockets of the folks who caused the need in the first place.
We end up supporting the religious tyrants who are commiting the genocide, the religious murders and the oppression that their gods call upon them to commit.

I agree, confess, admit and KNOW that we need to be and are responsible for helping those around the globe who are less fortunate than us.
God has blessed us and we need to be good stewards.

But should that have it's limits?
As a nation, we've given more than $350 million (USD) to the tsunami victims alone.
Not that we should not have, but we only have 368 million citizens in this country.
Could that money have been applied to Social Security?
Or Health Care?

We should have given to the tsunami victims, but shouldn't those who are leaders of those nations and of the U.N. been more responsible?
Be more accountable?
Shouldn't our money come with conditions as it does when returned to us in the form of loans, grants and benefits?

Yes, let's be the leader of the free and Christian world and give to our brothers in need.
But let's set limits and conditions to that help/aid.

What do you think?

Email me
NEW TOPIC - HUMANITARIANISM!
That is according to "YOUR" interpretations, Jesse!
The Correct Scripture quote is: